The Peel Web
I am happy that you are using this web site and hope that you found it useful. Unfortunately, the cost of making this material freely available is increasing, so if you have found the site useful and would like to contribute towards its continuation, I would greatly appreciate it. Click the button to go to Paypal and make a donation.
1830 proved to be a turning point for the people who wanted parliamentary reform:
The 1830 election weakened Wellington's government and strengthened the reformers. Wellington needed substantial gains, which did not materialise. Unexpected losses damaged his prestige, however. Electors unexpectedly voted for reform candidates and revolted against their usual allegiances. This was indicative of:
In the 1830 election, reformers urged voters to be independent of influence: the press advocated honest voting. This led to some odd results.
The electoral protest was directed more against the system than the government. A system so widely hated by the middle classes - now men of property and education - began to threaten the aristocracy who decided that their best course might be to scrap the old system.
The Rev. W Shepherd, writing in The Times on l4 May 1832 said that the 1830 election
|taught the small freeholders their real importance, and ... had shown how titled wealth may be driven from the field. When swarms of independent yeomen repair to the county town at their own expense ... the unpopular candidate ... retires worn and discomfited.|
Expensive elections actually helped popular candidates because they put unpopular ones to heavy expenses bringing in outvoters, 'treating' and bribing electors. The events of the 1830 election brought a sense of urgency to the Whigs' championship of reform and converted many to the idea. Sir Robert Heron wrote on November 1830:
|Two years ago I thought Reform of Parliament almost hopeless. I now believe it to be certain and approaching. The longer delayed, the more it will be radical.|
Anti-reformers blamed the July Revolution in France for the demands for political reform in Britain. In October 1831, Lord Lyndhurst told the House of Lords that until news of the revolution in France arrived
the cry was all over the country for negro emancipation. But after the news arrived ... the cry was changed, and the universal demand was for reform.
The facts do not support Lyndhurst's opinion. News of the events in France arrived in Britain on 3 August, after most of the elections had been held. The July Revolution affected British politics more after the election than during it. It helped to determine the behaviour of MPs when parliament met, because as Lord Wharncliffe wrote to Wellington on 30 November 1831, 'The demonstration in favour of Reform at the General Election of 1830 satisfied me that the feeling upon it was not ... temporary and likely to die away'.
Few people actually opposed reform in the 1830 general election, apart from Wellington and Peel. The idea had general support from radicals to Ultras.
|Meet the web creator||
These materials may be freely used for
non-commercial purposes in accordance with applicable statutory allowances
and distribution to students.
Last modified 6 January, 2011
|American Affairs 1760-83||The Age of the French Wars 1792-1815||Irish Affairs 1760-89|
|Economic Affairs in the Age of Peel||Irish
|Primary sources index||British Political Personalities||British Foreign policy 1815-65||European history||